The issue of global warming (or climate change) is,
scientifically, easy to understand. Human activity
has altered the natural composition of our
atmosphere. We have added carbon dioxide (CO2), and
other gases (methane, sulfer hexaflouride and others)
that trap energy that would otherwise be radiated into
space. Collectively these gases are known
as greenhouse gases (or GHGs).
The complications
begin when we try to figure out precise impacts of the
increased concentrations of GHGs. Generally, more
energy in the earth's climate system means severe
weather events of greater frequencey and intensity.
The generally warmer conditions throw biosystems out
of whack, alter our expected weather patterns, allow
diseases to spread, increase water stress, and
increase potential for flooding--just to name a few
impacts, but it is impossible to make exact
predictions of what will happen.
To stop what is
considered catastrophic levels of damages, emissions
of GHGs have to be cut by 50-80% from today's levels.
This is not an easy task howeever as burning fossil
fuels, the principle source of GHGs, is currently
necessary to drive the world economy. Also
problematic is the fact there there are no
technologies currently available that will solve this
problem, the solution will require using all available
technologies and practice at our disposal.
Naturally, there will be costs associated with
addressing this issue. The best economists in the
world tell us that from the world's perspective, it is
in our best interest to act. Unfortunately, we are up
against powerful economic and political forces. In
particular, a clean planet is a public good (those
who do not pay for it will still enjoy the benefits
provided by those who do)--the temptation is always
there to let others do the work.
Also, the benefits
are imprecise, we don't know exactly who will be the
beneficiaries or when the benefits will
arrive, whereas the costs are much easier
to attribute. Poorly defined, but real future
benefits weighed against current costs presents
difficult political problems despite the severity of
the potential losses. Given the costs involved,
political difficulties in pursuing meaningful action,
technical difficulties in developing practicable
solutions, climate change is perhaps the greatest
challenge we have ever faced.
There are a few bright spots however. Although many
say that effective legislation is too expensive, that
is simply not true. Economic models show costs on the
order of 1-5% of world GDP in 2020--while per capita
GDP over the same time frame is expected to go up by
over 100% (I have to double check this number)-- so,
everybody can be twice as rich as they are now and the
planet can be saved.
And yes, you can make a
difference! Easy steps--Vote for people who
understand the issue instead of those trying to
conform reality to their own political ideology; buy
products from companies with good environmental
performance;
adopt energy saving technology (yes it costs more up
front, but saves you money in the long run<--save the
world and save money!)...easy example--buying compact
flourescent lightbulbs; walk/bike--good for you, good
for the environment. And the not so easy
step--realize we are a community, you are a citizen of
the world, and you owe it to your fellow citizens and
to future generations to do your part.
If you have questions or comments, please send them to
mac@vermillionlies.com